Which scenario indicates intentional culpability?

Intentional culpability refers to a situation where an individual acts with a conscious purpose to achieve a specific outcome, particularly when that outcome involves causing harm or committing a crime. In the context of the scenario where a person acts with the purpose of causing harm, the intent is clear: the person has a deliberate goal of inflicting damage or injury on another individual or property. This aligns directly with the legal definition of intentional actions, which requires a purposeful mindset, distinguishing it from actions taken accidentally or without forethought.

In contrast, causing damage accidentally or acting without thinking do not reflect intentional culpability because they lack the requisite intent to harm. Similarly, spreading rumors can be harmful but may not always meet the standard of intentionality, as the spreader may not have the purpose of causing harm but rather may act thoughtlessly or without considering the potential consequences of their actions. Thus, the scenario involving purposeful action towards causing harm is the clear representation of intentional culpability.